“The U.S. expects to have 160 million doses of swine flu vaccine available sometime in October”, (Associated Press, 23 July 2009)
“Vaccine makers could produce 4.9 billion pandemic flu shots per year in the best-case scenario”, Margaret Chan, Director-General, World Health Organization (WHO), quoted by Reuters, 21 July 2009)
Wealthier countries such as the U.S. and Britain will pay just under $10 per dose [of the H1N1 flu vaccine]. … Developing countries will pay a lower price.” [Circa $400 billion for Big Pharma] (Business Week, July 2009)
The epidemiological data presented to the public is nothing more than manipulated data created to mislead the public. Conveniently, the outbreak, which initially took place in Mexico in April this year, came about during a time of economic crisis and increased military activity. Throughout history, a favourite tactic of corrupt governments is to clog the media with “crisis” to occupy the public from the real issues at hand. Continuing the tradition of fear mongering, the World Health Organization (WHO) has stated, “2 billion people [who] could become infected over the next two years — nearly one-third of the world population.” (World Health Organization as reported by the Western media, July 2009). Wanting to get in on the act the Obama administration has said, “swine flu could strike up to 40 percent of Americans … and as many as several hundred thousand could die if a vaccine campaign and other measures aren’t successful.” (Official Statement of the US Administration Associated Press, 24 July 2009).
When the WHO moved the worldwide alert to level 5, it was based on false data. The WHO went as far as to state that a “global outbreak of the disease is imminent”. It lied about the mortality rate in Mexico. In her 29th April 2009 official statement, WHO Director General Dr Margaret Chan said, “So far, 176 people have been killed in Mexico”. What she did not mention was that this figure was not based on anything. The Mexican Ministry of Health reported that 159 died from influenza out of which only seven deaths were because of the H1N1 swine flue strain. The WHO is re-grouping several common flu cases as H1N1 swine flu. Even so, the WHO has now raised the worldwide alert to level 6.
June 2009 WHO Press Conference
“Marion Falco, CNN Atlanta: My question may be a little basic but if you are not, and so forgive me for that, if you are not requiring testing in the countries that already have well established numbers of cases, then how are you distinguishing between seasonal flu and this particular flu. I mean how are you going to separate the numbers?
Dr Fukuda, WHO, Geneva: It is not that we are recommending not doing any testing at all. In fact when the guidance comes out, what it will suggest is what countries are to do is tailor down their testing so that they are not trying to test everybody but certainly keeping up testing of some people for exactly the kinds of reasons that you bring up. When people get sick with an influenza-like illness it will be important for us to know whether is it caused by the pandemic virus or whether is caused by seasonal viruses. What we are indicating is that if you ratchet down the level of testing we will still be able to figure that out and so we do not need to test everybody for that, but we will continue to recommend some level of testing – at a lower level of people who continue to get sick.”
From the answer provided by Dr Fukuda, it is clear that:
1) The WHO is not collecting data on the spread of H1N1 based on systematic lab confirmation.
2) The WHO in fact discourages national health officials to conduct detection and laboratory confirmation, while also pressuring the countries’ public health authorities to deliver to the WHO on a weekly basis the data on H1N1 cases.
3) The WHO in its reporting only refers to “confirmed cases” It does not distinguish between confirmed and non-confirmed case. It would appear that the “non-confirmed” cases are categorized as confirmed cases and the numbers are then used by the WHO to prove that the disease is spreading. (See WHO tables: http://www.who.int/csr/don/2009_07_06/en/index.html)
Still, governments are now looking into compulsory vaccinations, so who would profit from such a move. Big Pharma companies like Baxter, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis and AstraZeneca who have signed procurement contracts with some 50 governments would certainly appreciate the government’s efforts. (Reuters, July 16, 2009).
During a report in July this year, CNN stated that the Pentagon is “to establish regional teams of military personnel to assist civilian authorities in the event of a significant outbreak of the H1N1 virus this fall, according to Defense Department officials.”
“The proposal is awaiting final approval from Defense Secretary Robert Gates.
The officials would not be identified because the proposal from U.S. Northern Command’s Gen. Victor Renuart has not been approved by the secretary.
“The plan calls for military task forces to work in conjunction with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). There is no final decision on how the military effort would be manned, but one source said it would likely include personnel from all branches of the military.
“It has yet to be determined how many troops would be needed and whether they would come from the active duty or the National Guard and Reserve forces.
“Civilian authorities would lead any relief efforts in the event of a major outbreak, the official said. The military, as they would for a natural disaster or other significant emergency situation could provide support and fulfill any tasks that civilian authorities could not, such as air transport or testing of large numbers of viral samples from infected patients.
“As a first step, Gates is being asked to sign a so-called “execution order” that would authorize the military to begin to conduct the detailed planning to execute the proposed plan.
“Orders to deploy actual forces would be reviewed later, depending on how much of a health threat the flu poses this fall, the officials said.” (CNN, Military planning for possible H1N1 outbreak, July 2009)
In short, this move will result in the militarisation of several civilian institutions like public enforcement and public health. Pharmaceutical corporations are already planning to deliver 160 million vaccine doses by autumn this year whilst the WHO envisages 4.9 billion doses to come.
In addition, the Pentagon has planned to deploy the military in order to support mass vaccination defying the Posse Comitatus Act. The purpose of the act was to prevent the federal authorities use the military for law enforcement purposes. It was passed during the military occupation by the US Army of the former Confederate States effectively eliminating the presence of the military.
Interestingly, it was the Secretary of Defence and not the President who decided military involvement suggesting the Pentagon may have clandestine interests in the matter. Moreover, the US Congress has not been consulted whatsoever on the issue.
Those who have called for military intervention have argued that it is in anticipation of a national emergency. This ludicrous idea is built upon the false premise of the WHO’s level 6 Pandemic. Countries like Canada, the UK and France could also use the military to support the H1N1 vaccination program.
GPs Reject Jab
In the UK up to half of GPs who despite being on the government’s “priority list” rejected the vaccine on grounds of it not being tested enough. What’s more, they argue that the flu is so mild that it does not warrant a vaccine. The common cold kills 300,000 to 500,000 people every year. Meanwhile, the swine flu has killed fewer than 500 people worldwide. Nevertheless, GPs have come under heavy criticism from the government who say that by refusing the jab they are unnecessarily endangering the lives of their patients.
Vivienne Parry, a member of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, (JCVI) said that professionals like GPs are under a duty to protect “vulnerable patients” from the flu. She added, “This (protection) aspect does not seem to feature at all in medical staff responses about flu vaccination, which is extremely concerning.
A recent survey for GP magazine illustrated that doctors were still adamant over not taking the jab. In the survey 29% of doctors said they would reject the vaccine, another 29% were undecided and just 41% agreed to have the jab. Of those who rejected the jab, 71% refused it believing it to be unsafe. Editor of Pulse Magazine Richard Hoey stated, “The medical profession has yet to be convinced by the Government’s whole approach to swine flu, with most GPs now feeling that the Department of Health overreacted in its policy on blanket use of Tamiflu.
A study published by the British Medical journal showed that half of 8,500 workers in Hong Kong would not take the swine flue vaccination again because of safety concerns and its ineffectiveness to deal with the virus.
One of the major fears over the H1N1 vaccination is that it can spark cases of Guillain Barre Syndrome, which ultimately could lead to paralysis and even death. Looking back at the swine flu of 1976 a mass vaccination programme was also implemented however, the jab killed more people than the disease it was created to combat. Despite the swine flu vaccination being hurried through safety procedures, the WHO has still maintained its safety. If the vaccination is so safe then why have governments provided pharmaceutical companies with blanket immunities from possible lawsuits? The answer probably lies in the fact that it has been revealed that some batches of the vaccine contain mercury, which has been linked with autism and neurological disorders, and squalene, which has been directly linked with cases of Gulf War Syndrome and a host of other debilitating diseases.
What the inoculations are actually doing
“The flu season is upon us. Which type will we worry about this year, and what kind of shots will we be told to take? Remember the swine flu scare of 1976? That was the year the U.S. government told us all that swine flu could turn out to be a killer that could spread across the nation, and Washington decided that every man, woman and child in the nation should get a shot to prevent a nation-wide outbreak, a pandemic.” (Mike Wallace, CBS, 60 Minutes, November 4, 1979)
“The federal officials and industry representatives had assembled to discuss a disturbing new study that raised alarming questions about the safety of a host of common childhood vaccines administered to infants and young children. According to a CDC epidemiologist named Tom Verstraeten, who had analyzed the agency’s massive database containing the medical records of 100,000 children, a mercury-based preservative in the vaccines — thimerosal — appeared to be responsible for a dramatic increase in autism and a host of other neurological disorders among children….
“It’s hard to calculate the damage to our country – and to the international efforts to eradicate epidemic diseases — if Third World nations come to believe that America’s most heralded foreign-aid initiative is poisoning their children. It’s not difficult to predict how this scenario will be interpreted by America’s enemies abroad.” (Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Vaccinations: Deadly Immunity, June 2005)
“Vaccines are supposed to be making us healthier; however, in twenty-five years of nursing I have never seen so many damaged, sick kids. Something very, very wrong is happening to our children.”(Patti White, School nurse, statement to the House Government Reform Committee, 1999, quoted in Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Vaccinations: Deadly Immunity, June 2005)
“On the basis of … expert assessments of the evidence, the scientific criteria for an influenza pandemic have been met. I have therefore decided to raise the level of influenza pandemic alert from Phase 5 to Phase 6. The world is now at the start of the 2009 influenza pandemic. Margaret Chan, Director-General, World Health Organization (WHO), Press Briefing 11 June 2009)
“As many as 2 billion people could become infected over the next two years — nearly one-third of the world population.” (World Health Organization as reported by the Western media, July 2009)
“Swine flu could strike up to 40 percent of Americans over the next two years and as many as several hundred thousand could die if a vaccine campaign and other measures aren’t successful.” (Official Statement of the US Administration Associated Press, 24 July 2009).
“The U.S. expects to have 160 million doses of swine flu vaccine available sometime in October.” (Associated Press, 23 July 2009)
“Vaccine makers could produce 4.9 billion pandemic flu shots per year in the best-case scenario.” Margaret Chan, Director-General, World Health Organization (WHO), quoted by Reuters, 21 July 2009)
Wealthier countries such as the U.S. and Britain will pay just under $10 per dose [of the H1N1 flu vaccine]…Developing countries will pay a lower price.” [Circa $400 billion for Big Pharma]. (Business Week, July 2009).
Disconcertingly an official government report has stated that there will be a large number of deaths in the case of a swine flu pandemic without any sound evidence. The report detailed government proposals to set up mass graves for the victims of the H1N1 virus. “The Framework for Planners Preparing to Manage Deaths” the 59-page report speaks of “a grave that is for a number of unrelated persons, excavated mechanically in advance and designed for efficient preparation and use.”
It added that this would create a “burial site for multiple graves and consecutive burials” but there needs to be a “marking of the position of individual burials”. It also mentions that some cemeteries “may experience shortage of grave space, in particular in inner city areas”. Whitehall has spoken to coffin makers to ensure they can meet their strenuous demands. Moreover, the NHS has pleaded to the public to supply blood to avoid shortages later on.
Their claims are of course over exaggerated to say the least. It is just another attempt for them to try to justify forced inoculations, which they may due soon. They estimate the H1N1 virus will kill 55,000 to 750,000. The very same virus UK doctors have labelled mild and undeserving of a jab. There will also be a need for more “basic and shorter services at the chapel” or for “memorial services” to be held at the victim’s home instead. The report does not stop there however. The NHS may be so overwhelmed with cases that retired doctors could be called back to the profession to issue death certificates allowing GPs to concentrate on patients.
Black propaganda aside, what is the reality of the virus in the UK thus far. To date, 44 people in England have been confirmed as victims of the virus while Scotland has confirmed only five falling somewhat short of the government’s 55,000. The details discussed in the governmental report serves only to create mass panic and a health crisis.
A spokesperson for the Home Office said that all this planning is precautionary. She added, “It is important to stress that these are possible scenarios, not certainties, so that our stakeholders can plan for the worst and be prepared to deal with the outbreak effectively.”
These claims are built on manipulated data, so how can the government or the WHO plan accordingly. Both the UK government and the WHO have failed to provide any evidence of their claims and are instead purposefully misleading people. On the other hand, there is a plethora of evidence suggesting that the WHO’s level 6 pandemic alert is false.
More Harm than Good
Plenty of documented evidence suggests that similar to the 1976 swine flu outbreak, the H1N1 vaccination could kill more people than the flu itself. The British Health Protection Agency sent a confidential letter to senior neurologists warning that the H1N1 jab is linked to a deadly nerve disease. The letter, which was leaked to The Mail on Sunday, has led many to question why such information was kept from the public. It informed some 600 neurologists that the vaccine could trigger Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS). Reference to the 1976 swine flu in the US when:
- More people died from the vaccination than from swine flu.
- 500 cases of GBS were detected.
- The vaccine may have increased the risk of contracting GBS by eight times.
- The vaccine was withdrawn after just ten weeks when the link with GBS became clear.
- The US Government was forced to pay out millions of dollars to those affected.
Still the British government without having tested the vaccine has announced that 13 million people will have the jab.
On 28th August, Associated Press conducted an interview with French Health Minister Roselyne Bachelot during which Bachelot maintained that the vaccination would be voluntary but that every citizen should get the shot out of “altruism” to protect themselves and others. “We are getting ready for a flu that could be very serious for those with risk factors,” she proclaimed. France has purchased 94 million doses of the vaccine at the cost of €1 billion.
However, a leaked internal government document signed by Bachelot tells a very different story. The document, which can be found here, speaks of “vaccination centers” and inoculating babies as young as six month old. Though the document does not expressly state that the shots will be mandatory, it does say that the whole population will be vaccinated without exception, which does not leave the population with much choice. The site theflucase.com has a good breakdown and analysis of the article.
On 21st August 2009, top scientists, industry leaders and top health officials met up to partake in an international swine flu summit in Washington DC. According to an information leaflet, which was released before the summit, those attending the summit, were versed on how to “Manage interruptions in food, fuel & essentials supply chains & establish stockpiles” and “Manage panic caused by sudden disruption of services & interruptions in essential goods & services.”
The leaflet also informs the attendees on how to “conduct morgue operations” and more alarmingly, it discusses our “unwillingness to follow government orders”, yet not a single news source has mentioned this conference.
The leaflet goes on to brief on how to “Effectively undertake mass vaccinations”; “Enforce quarantines” and “transport ill students”. This suggests that any child that falls ill will be transported to a quarantine zone with or without the parents’ consent. Authorities have been training to extract children from schools during a crisis for over a decade now. They attempt to justify it by arguing that it is in case there is a school shooting or they simply searching for drugs. The Associated Press reported on one of these raids stating:
“A school safety drill that included police officers in riot gear with weapons has caused concern among some parents who say it was too realistic and frightened some students.”
“Students, who were unaware police were conducting a drill, were taken from the classroom into the halls, patted down by officers and asked what they had in their pockets, the newspaper said.”
“Some of these kids were so scared, they just about wet their pants,” said Marge Bradshaw, a parent with four children in Godfrey-Lee Schools. “I think its pure wrong that the students and parents were not informed of this.”
In February 2002 U.S. District Judge E. Richard Webber issued the permanent injunction. The injunction bars Heartland children from being taken into protective custody without a hearing unless the child “is in imminent danger of suffering serious physical harm, threat to life from abuse or neglect, or has been sexually abused” or imminently faces such abuse. The request for the injunction came after law enforcers and juvenile officials in an October 2001 raid took 115 children from the rural complex by buses. The worrying thing is that an injunction has to be requested to prevent the military from raiding schools. If there is a public crisis, it will be because people are refusing to take the inoculation and not because there is a shortage of jabs. The military will probably be used to put us in line and ensure we take the jab for our own good.
But then again, the swine flu is so incredibly deadly that we need to listen to our kind and loving government and take the vaccination. I am glad the government is looking out for our safety and I will be the first in line to trust the government and give up all my rights and freedoms; I mean look at how safe the Germans were during Nazi Germany. I realise I have been an extremist conspiracy theorist and I have learnt the error of my ways. After all, the world is the safe place it is today because of all the wars that have been started. The war on terror was a huge success and we have the government to thank for that, so surely they must be right about the H1N1 vaccinations, right?